What are the implications for regional trade and investment of the Turkiye-Abu Dhabi port deal failure?

The failed port negotiations between Turkiye and Abu Dhabi Ports (ADP) represent a major disappointment for the economic goals of both countries. Turkiye’s Transportation Minister Abdulkadir Uraloglu stated that negotiations for expanding İzmir’s Alsancak Port ended without agreement which would have improved Turkiye’s maritime trade capabilities.

It is clear that the collapse of this deal obstructs planned infrastructure advancements while also jeopardising the target to boost bilateral trade from $10 billion in 2022 to $40bn by 2028. This situation demonstrates the widespread difficulties encountered by international trade partnerships and their subsequent impact on regional economies.

Relatedly, the planned Alsancak Port expansion aimed to achieve a 20 per cent rise in cargo handling, which was vital because Turkiye serves as a key trade hub between Europe and Asia and the Middle East. The project matched Turkiye’s Vision 2023 goals which stressed the importance of logistics infrastructure development to advance its position in global trade.

Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman states that investing in infrastructure is vital for long-term economic growth because it improves productivity and trade efficiency.

Abu Dhabi viewed its investment in Turkiye’s port infrastructure as part of its economic diversification strategy to move beyond oil reliance. The “Future of the UAE Economy” highlights Sultan Al-Jaber’s view that global trade route investments are vital to UAE economic stability after oil.

Multiple elements led to the breakdown of the negotiation process.

Discussions with industry experts have shown conflicts about financial arrangements together with operational authority and future revenue division.

Maritime trade analyst Mehmet Demir observed that the two parties possessed distinct expectations about profit margins and organisational management structures. The deal faced additional challenges due to the geopolitical tensions alongside fluctuating economic conditions present in both countries.

As political scientist Ian Bremmer said in the J Curve: International investments face invisible barriers because geopolitical uncertainties exist, especially within regions undergoing political development.

READ: Turkiye offers to host possible Ukraine-Russia talks

In that regards, the deal’s failure carries significant economic repercussions. The UAE-bilateral trade expansion target set by Turkiye for 2028 encounters increased unpredictability. Alsancak Port’s modernisation will need more public funds and may face delays if foreign investment fails to materialise. Turkiye’s portion of Mediterranean trade may decrease since Piraeus Port in Greece and Gioia Tauro Port in Italy keep expanding their operations.

Moreover, the failure could undermine the trust placed by investors in Turkiye’s infrastructure sector. Global financial investors pay close attention to these negotiation processes because they serve as signals about a nation’s investment environment. The failure to finalise an agreement with ADP, which maintains a broad global portfolio, might trigger doubts about the transparency of regulations and the stability of political and commercial environments.

According to Joseph Stiglitz’s Globalisation and Its Discontents, investor confidence fluctuates based on perceptions of governance and economic fundamentals.

Hence, the setback offers Turkiye a window to review and modify its investment strategies.

Turkiye ought to establish investment relationships with partners from Europe and East Asia. Diversifying sources of investment helps reduce geopolitical risk while delivering better financial terms. It has the option to use public-private partnerships (PPPs) to fund port expansions following the successful example of Istanbul’s Marmaray project.

Failed negotiations in the UAE demonstrate the challenging nature of cross-border investments in areas where regulations are constantly changing. ADP is beginning to search for different Mediterranean ports to boost its European trade connections. The loss of collaboration with Turkiye represents a strategic disadvantage because Turkiye plays a central role in regional logistics operations.

In conclusion, both nations need to approach the outcomes of this failed agreement through pragmatic solutions and renewed diplomatic efforts. Turkiye needs to focus on renewing infrastructure projects such as Alsancak Port to maintain its economic growth in the coming years. As part of its Vision 2030 objectives, the UAE needs to pursue investment ventures that support economic expansion and worldwide integration.

The failed negotiations over the port between Turkiye and Abu Dhabi Ports present a short-term obstacle but provide an opportunity to re-evaluate investment strategies and fortify economic defences. Both nations need to modify their strategies to remain competitive and promote sustainable growth as global trade patterns change within a more connected world.

READ: Turkiye wants gas supply deal extension with Turkmenistan, minister says

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.