Why the world needs faith, the only remaining sanctuary of serenity

The age-old debate between faith and atheism emerged alongside the very first stirrings of human consciousness. It is a centuries-long conflict that has consumed rivers of ink and fueled fierce intellectual battles, yet its historical calculus has yielded nothing tangible to alter the core of human suffering. Atheists have gained little from their denial save for a life beneath a cold, glass sky, adrift in a mechanical, purposeless cosmos. Meanwhile, believers—of all stripes—have walked away with the ultimate prize: spiritual reassurance and inner tranquility. Today, tossed by the mounting waves of anxiety, the digital-age human frantically scrambles to find selfhood and validate existence. In a world where purely material solutions have thoroughly exhausted their promises, humanity no longer needs faith as a mere system of rituals or a routine of worship, but as an ideal, final recourse to reclaim a lost serenity.

This spiritual longing among history’s finest minds is precisely what British author Thomas Oppong—a writer specialising in human behavior and practical philosophy—addresses in his Medium essay, “Einstein Believed in God.” Oppong reconstructs the spiritual convictions of humanity’s sharpest intellect, reminding us that Albert Einstein’s faith was not an allegiance to traditional theology. Rather, it was a profound cognitive reverence before the genius of creation—a conscious effort to provide scientific inquiry with an ethical and spiritual framework, shielding it from becoming sterile or sliding into nihilism.

A closer look at Einstein’s life reveals that this magnificent visionary felt no embarrassment in declaring his faith in a sublime cosmic order. In his famous 1929 telegram, he stated unequivocally: “I believe in Spinoza’s God, who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists.”

Einstein did not conceive of the divine as an anthropomorphic entity preoccupied with punishing or rewarding humans for the minutiae of their daily lives. Instead, he experienced what he termed a “cosmic religious feeling”—that sublime fusion of awe and wonder that captivates a scientist when observing rigorous physical laws manifest throughout existence in a miraculous mathematical design that leaves no room for blind chance. This visceral feeling forms the bedrock of understanding faith, not as an act of theological coercion, but as an urgent intellectual and psychological necessity to acknowledge an intelligent architecture operating behind this vast expanse.

Anchoring our perspective in Einstein’s experience opens a broader horizon for defending the concept of faith.

We are not concerned here, by any means, with the deification of mortals, nor with granting dispensations to clergy and religious institutions that have so often distorted the essence of spiritual life, reducing it to a tool for social or political control.

We place worship and rituals exactly where they belong: as a free, deeply personal choice for each individual to practice in a manner that aligns with their inner calling and yields personal peace. What we advocate for, and insist upon, is faith as a psychological anchor and an existential refuge—a conscious acknowledgment that behind this existence lies a supreme, universal intellect that infuses our fragile lives with meaning, catching the human being before a freefall into the abyss of absurdity.

OPINION: How the Mecca pact turns faith into security

This spiritual anchor assumes its highest value today as we witness the peak of a silent, friction-filled collision between humanity and intelligent machines.

In an era where technology and algorithms deliver “ready-made,” pre-programmed answers for everything—threatening to strip humans of their singularity by converting emotions, thoughts, and behaviors into predictable, commodified data—the individual faces a novel brand of alienation.

The machine can simulate our intelligence, calculate our steps, and generate our prose, yet it stands barren and helpless before the question of “meaning.” Here, faith emerges as the final line of defense for human exceptionalism. It is the sole sanctuary that algorithms cannot infiltrate or model, precisely because it flows from a living, profound experience of surrender, wonder, and communion with the absolute—emotional constructs that defy automated generation and dry lines of code.

And as global powers race to weaponize artificial intelligence—from autonomous warfare to algorithmic governance—the question of meaning is no longer a private spiritual concern. It has become a geopolitical fault line: a struggle over what remains uniquely human in an age when machines increasingly shape the fate of nations. Faith, in this context, is not merely a personal refuge but a civilizational necessity, preserving the moral and existential core that no superpower can outsource to code.

In this world crowded with intelligent machines, the philosophical and political panaceas that once promised absolute prosperity have narrowed, leaving behind a society plagued by suffocating isolation and unprecedented rates of depression and existential dread.

The human being has transitioned from the “creator of the machine” into a mere “cog in its engine,” sprinting breathlessly to satisfy the demands of rapid consumption.

This has torn open a massive spiritual void that cannot be filled by processor speeds or smartphone screens. Faith arrives as the ideal antidote to this homogenization; it serves to remind the human being that they are not merely a statistical cipher or a commercial asset in a data market, but a conscious entity carrying a spark of a higher, cosmic spirit. It restores existential dignity and imparts tranquility amid the din of a mechanical world obsessed with the material.

Exhausted by the friction of competing with machines and the exhausting battles of virtual reality, the contemporary human needs to close their eyes and feel neither alone nor forgotten in this vast universe.

The human mind, regardless of its analytical sharpness or empirical brilliance, remains inadequate and terrified before the notion that it is merely transient cosmic dust without direction or purpose.

This is precisely where faith steps in to recalibrate the narrative and soothe the wounds of a fractured soul. It restores equilibrium, calming the mind in the face of mortality, absence, and those lingering questions that rigid physics can never answer.

The long arc of human history has proven that science and technology can explain with immense precision how the universe moves and how our devices operate. Yet, they remain utterly incapable of telling us why we are here, or what the ultimate purpose of our existence is. Without an answer to this fundamental “why,” the human being—despite all technical opulence—remains anxious, alienated, and terrified of the future. Faith, in the sublime, structurally deep sense that Einstein experienced and Oppong analyzed, is not a shackle on sharp intellect; it is its liberation and crowning achievement. It is a humble concession of our relative consciousness before the absolute cosmos—the only remaining sanctuary for a species that proudly insists on remaining serene in a world drowning in fear and machinery.

OPINION: When allies change the rules: A language Israel has never liked hearing

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.